Observers of Edo State politics, are no doubt familiar with a recurring phenomenon – the serial aspirants who proclaim themselves as the epitome of leadership but consistently falter when put to the test at the polls.
These individuals, driven by an unrelenting “only me” syndrome, prioritize personal ambitions over equity, fair play, and justice within the political landscape.
But let us into the disconcerting characteristics that define these aspirants, from their reluctance to embrace democratic processes to their tendency to mismanage party resources for personal gain.
One glaring trait of these serial aspirants is their steadfast resistance to accepting primary assignments. Despite the democratic ethos embedded in the party structure, they shy away from internal competition, undermining the principles of fair play and justice.
Begging fervently for the party ticket, they reveal a paradoxical aversion to proving their mettle in primary elections, raising questions about their commitment to the democratic process.
These aspirants, driven by an insatiable desire for power, often oppose the very ideals of equity, fair play, and justice. Their relentless pursuit of personal gain eclipses the broader goals of the party, creating an environment of internal strife and division.
By resisting fair processes, they perpetuate a culture of cronyism, eroding the democratic foundation on which the political system should thrive.
The detrimental “only me” syndrome that plagues these serial aspirants impedes their ability to foster collaboration and unity. Even when fellow party members graciously step down to pave the way for their candidacy, they fail to reciprocate, isolating themselves from potential allies. This self-centered approach hampers their capacity to build a strong support base, ultimately affecting their electoral prospects.
A disturbing trend among these aspirants is the parade of fake and outdated credentials. In their quest for power, they resort to deceptive practices, presenting qualifications that do not stand up to scrutiny. This not only undermines the integrity of the electoral process but also raises concerns about the moral compass of those who aspire to lead.
Perhaps the most damaging aspect of these serial aspirants’ approach is their proclivity to mismanage party resources. Funds earmarked for election campaigns are diverted into their private coffers, betraying the trust of party members and compromising the party’s overall electoral strategy. This financial mismanagement further tarnishes the party’s image and weakens its standing in the eyes of the electorate.
The prevalence of serial aspirants in Edo State politics, characterized by their self-centric tendencies and disregard for democratic principles, poses a significant challenge to the vitality of the political landscape. As voters become increasingly discerning, it is imperative for the party and electorate alike to scrutinize candidates rigorously.
By recognizing and addressing these concerning traits, Edo State can foster a political environment that values transparency, fairness, and genuine commitment to the welfare of the people over individual ambition.